Header Ads Widget

Evergrande crisis | The end of China's economic miracle?



Evergrande is China’s largest  property development company and was (up until recently) one of the  most valuable companies in the world. However most analysts are now  predicting that this company is on the verge of insolvency and won’t  be able to meet its mountainous debt obligations without direct government intervention within the next few weeks.

For those of you who are not already aware this has the potential to be far more than  a run of the mill corporate bankruptcy. The company employs over 200,000 people directly  while also providing work for as many as 4 million subcontractors who work to erect thousands  of buildings for the company every year.

Beyond just job losses, the company is also  holding deposits for 1.5 million properties that may not be delivered to regular Chinese citizens who were just looking for  a home or an investment property. Now loosing a home is terrible in ANY  country, but perhaps nowhere more so than in China. The value of these properties  compared to the incomes of people buying them is astronomical, and it often takes multiple  family generations to save up for a deposit.

Because of this, real estate has become basically  the only thing that most people invest in,   and over a million people losing that investment  will have massive knock on economic impacts beyond just putting people out on the streets  (as is that wasn’t bad enough already).
Despite these social issues and the apparent  threat to the national and global economy the Chinese government has said that they  are not prepared to bail out the company.

Why? Well politics… but there  are a few things that you need to understand about this crisis as  we watch it play out in real time.

The first is how this collapse actually started in what looked like an  otherwise very healthy company. The second is how bad could this get  if the government DOESN’T step in. And the third is, Will this all be contained? Or could this leak out and cause an economic  collapse in countries outside of China?

So many people are  calling this China’s Lehman moment, in reference to the American investment  bank Lehman Brothers which was allowed to go bankrupt in 2008 effectively kicking  off the 2008 Global Financial Crisis.

There are a lot of similarities here. Both of these companies are very large, they both  have a lot of debt on their books, that debt is being offset with assets that may not be nearly  as valuable as people might think, and finally they both look to have been left for dead by their  governments which have decided to let them fail.

Now of course Evergrande is not a bank,  it’s a property development company, but in China that’s almost worse. Property is basically the only thing  that average citizens invest in so it’s as if you took the US financial  market and housing market and rolled them all up into one for people to  speculate on… sort of like in 2008.

Now the regulators knew this, and  they saw the problem of an asset price bubble having the potential  to cause major economic factors. It’s because of this, that the  story of Evergrande’s problems actually start more than a  year ago in august of 2020.

Property is never “owned” in China, it is leased  from the government for a set amount of time most commonly 70 years. These land leases are then  purchased by property developers like Evergrande. The property developers will then design apartment  buildings and pre-sell the units they designed to regular investors who will put down a deposit and  wait for the buildings to actually be finished.

The developer can then take this money and use  it as a down payment to borrow even more money to either buy up more land leases, or to use on  the actual construction of buildings on that land. This system works very well for rapid expansion  and it is in theory a win-win for everybody. 

Evergrande and other developers were able to buy  up more 70 year leases and build more houses, regular investors were able to get access  to properties that were far cheaper than   existing apartments for sale in china, and the  banks and non-bank lenders were able to give   money to an institution that was offering  good returns on a secured line of credit.

Most of these lenders figured that in  the extremely unlikely scenario that a company like Evergrande defaulted  on it’s debt’s they could just yoink the properties they had on their books  and easily cover all of these loans.

Now… Evergrande had seen that properties in China  were appreciating at a rate of about 10 – 15%  per year so they wanted to  push this limit to the extreme. They wanted to borrow more money, buy up  more land rights, pre-sell more apartments all in an attempt to grow as fast as possible. This did work well, the company was highly  profitable, it always had more assets than liabilities and continually gave consistent  returns to both equity and debt investors.

But all good things must come to an end and that  brings us back to August of 2020 when the Chinese government introduced new laws in to control the  amount of debts that developers could take on, and also how the money that companies like Evergrande  were getting of pre-sales could be used.

This was a big problem because it  radically altered the high growth business model that the company had become reliant on. The company basically needed a constant stream  of new money coming in from property buyers to keep the whole operation running,  but it did have a backup plan. If this money ever slowed down  the developer could just lower the prices on their pre-sales  to attract more buyers and prop up the system again. Sure they wouldn’t make  as much profit, but it’s better than nothing.

In a worst case scenario the company just kept  certain properties on their own books as real estate assets. This meant that they could borrow  even more against the value of these finished properties and never need to realise a loss by  selling a property for more than it cost to build. This was not a bad strategy considering  property price growth in China meant that the company only ever needed to  hold onto these properties for a few months at most before market forces  made them profitable to sell again.

However these new regulations meant  that the company was forced to hold onto more and more existing properties  while also needing to sell off their new developments at increasingly steep  discounts to keep the money flowing in.
This caused two problems, for starters it undermined all of the holdings that  they had to offset their liabilities.

As I said earlier that the  company had more assets than it did liabilities, and that is technically true, but only if you  accept that HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS OF DOLLARS worth of residential real estate holdings  are worth as much as the company says it is.
Even if we ignore the propensity of Chinese  companies to… “massage”… their figures a bit, this is an alarming number because these assets are  NOT liquid… which leads us to the next problem.

The new regulations have made it harder for  the company to borrow money to complete the projects it was working on. This has meant that  they company has had to sell more presales to fund existing projects which are in turn  going to be even harder to get funding for.

The questions raised about the true value  of the companies real estate holdings has meant that the company has had to seek finance  from not one or two banks like most companies, but from over 128 different banks and  hundreds of other non-bank lenders.

This started to raise alarm bells  with individual property investors who were waiting on their homes to be finished. Potential investors were starting  to see these massive real estate development projects (that used to  sell out within a matter of hours) were now being discounted over and  over again to try and attract buyers.

Even if their overall attitude towards  the real estate market was bullish, it only made sense to sit back a bit and see if  they could snag themselves a bigger discount. This closed the faucet on the cash injector that  kept everything going causing bigger discounts and bigger question marks over how much the companies  inventory of property was actually worth.

Now the company is in a situation where it  lacks the funds it needs to pay for day to day operations beyond the next few weeks. Of course it  could sell off these existing real estate assets as a last ditch attempt to free up some cash flow  but it would now be at a massive discount given the bad press and the fact that they wouldn’t  really have time to negotiate too hard on price.

Now that leads us onto how bad this could get. If the government did not intervene at  all the company would go into liquidation, the 1.5 million people that have paid  their deposits for homes that have not yet been built would lose that money  and the properties on the companies books would be sold off as quickly as possible  flooding the market with properties for sale.

Even in a company as hungry for real estate as  China this would inevitably drive down prices. It would simultaneously put more eyes on the other property development companies who would  inevitably be in a similar situation. If property prices fall then their  inventories are going to be worth less too, meaning they will have less assets to secure  loans against, which means more difficulty completing projects, which means more trouble  paying off loans which means more liquidations.

If you replace the words “Chinese  Apartments” with “Mortgage Backed Securities” it is easy to see why  people are calling this a Lehman Moment. Which leaves just one final question…  Will this impact markets in the rest world?

The GFC quickly spread from the US to Europe  and then on around the world. China is the second largest economy in the  world so it’s not unreasonable to be a little concerned with the  same thing happening here right?

Well yeah, we should all be  cautious of what this could mean, but I wouldn’t be overly worried just  yet. China’s markets by design are very closed off to the outside world which means  that they are much less interconnected with American markets than say American  markets are with European markets.

What’s more is that it’s hard to believe  that the Chinese government would let it get quiet that bad. The strength and  unfaltering growth of the Economy has been the linchpin of the current government. If they were to loose that they would not only have to deal with an economic catastrophe, but also widespread civil unrest as well.

As I said, this is a developing situation so  your guess about what comes next is just as good as mine, but at least you know the nuts  and bolts of the problem that they are facing.

Thanks for reading. We hope this was informative to you. Read more related articles.

Post a Comment

0 Comments